Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Maybe you should try it first? If your family distracts you, you also need to account for this with your time, not your shared time, again, out of respect for your opponent. Does that make sense? Wlk777
I'm explaining – there are real-time strategies where most of the decisions are made based on the speed of mouse movement, and turn-based strategies where the focus is on thinking, not speed. Limiting the time is a step towards real-time.
All the intellectual games I know (including What? Where? When?) are played with a time limit. Why? Wlk777
And in general, Konstantin, why aren't you on my side when you yourself love unlimited and offline play?
Offline play is like playing chess by correspondence, and it is also limited in time, but to 1 month! I enjoy online play with unlimited time, but I don't think it's right. Wlk777
I suggest you answer my question again: WHY are these limitations necessary when almost 100% of known players are quite conscientious and respect their own and others' time, even in full unlimited mode? For the sake of some mythical players who want to prolong the game, of whom there are almost none and few people encounter (for example, I have never encountered them).
The game is prolonged unconsciously. You can spend an extra minute or two thinking about a move. Yes, undoubtedly, games should be of higher quality in unlimited mode, but the factor of time, which forces the player to hurry and play with concentration, should also be present.
