Why not just draw lots to decide how to structure the skill discussion (which tends to turn into arguments), so that no one feels offended and no one has any complaints about you?

1. What's the point of drawing lots when one player only plays Light/Spider, another only plays SOD/SM, and a third only uses "large builds without computers"? There are only 2-3 possible options here, and I'll even use a coin to decide. 2. The argument was about the strength of Shakti/Gunnar. If you pit a clearly stronger player against a weaker one, the stronger player will likely win due to skill, unless they are completely outmatched. I'm 99% sure that Gunnar is stronger if Stinger plays him, and I play as the Shaman. And vice versa. There's nothing to be offended about; it's just a game. 3. I don't understand why it's so difficult to agree with Stinger and play a friendly match if you're so eager to do so? Satyr wanted to and played, and he's not causing any trouble here. Stop arguing. You signed up – play according to the rules you signed up for, and I'm not going to babysit anyone here. Added after 36 minutes In the second post, I wrote who should play against whom. You can play other pairs if you agree; it will be like a second round. There is no strict regulation, and there are no deadlines. GL