I announce to everyone, publicly, that I am leaving this tournament!
I am leaving because I played against an opponent and won the game against him!
I played by the rules! However, there was a controversial moment, we appealed to the supreme arbiter, and he made a ruling. We started a new game as per his suggestion... Later, after my victory, the opponent offers a draw, because he suddenly remembered that controversial moment.
After that, he blabbed like a real magpie about it to the whole World-wide community, and then the supreme arbiter asked me to agree to the draw...
Everyone who wrote on the forum discussing this topic refers to the rules, claiming that the supreme arbiter pressured my opponent! That the opponent should have decided whether to give me a restart or not. I don't think so. The supreme arbiter acted wisely and defended my honor on the entire forum.... There are many details that many don't even suspect, just lightly discussing.... You shouldn't do that, guys... My victory... precisely a victory, not a draw!!! I want Soroka white to be credited with it, he really wanted this!
With frank confessions, Your landless colleague
Added after 2 minutes
I don't know who was playing, but allow me to remark.
Kash, do you remember what you answered to this post:
/topic/at/308115/
The situation is similar as two peas in a pod.
Your answer.
This is a tournament, not a market where you can bargain. If you came up with such rules, then let's follow them. I said that similar situations could occur, but you yourself said sorry, we won't change the rules. So this is reaping what you sowed, no offense meant.
And if the AC decides to replay the game, that will go against the rules. For example, in this game, what could have happened next?
Player B gives a restart to player A due to a block. After the restart, player A discovers on day 4 that he has only 1 road to the Griffin Conservatory. He asks for a restart. According to moral rules, player B should give it, hmm... but what if he doesn't??
What is this haggling? Rules are rules.
To prevent this in the playoffs - change the rules for the tournament.
Kash - what was it about the action that you didn't like? Because according to your rules a restart is forbidden, and a person played by the rules????
P.S. I don't want to offend anyone and I don't know who was playing, just an interesting situation.
!
Added after 26 minutes
The game was mine! I played in the tournament with Soroka white. If you're still interested, I can send the saves. I don't like Soroka white's behavior. We played, I beat him with a worse setup than his, in my opinion. I would have also given him a restart, and any decent person would have given a restart for a block, even if it's not in the rules... Two native Strongholds throughout the entire month, I think it doesn't get any better than that, and that was on the final map... against my human town and Conflux where I was only getting money... 2 Castles against 4??? And he had the treasure zone right next to him....
And I didn't have any.... What saved me was building Angels... I took two Griffin Conservatories for a total of 3 Angels... and went to fight at 212, because I was tired of sitting around... I had to act... Since he didn't build gremlins... his fault... I told him, if he can beat those upgraded 91 Evil Eyes at 112, then it's his victory... he was daydreaming, and after coming back down to earth... he said that at 121 he could really beat them... they didn't even fight for me at 131... But he was silent as a mouse and was no longer shouting that he could make them... I chose the restarts at the beginning... then he chose them... and he also asked for autos, but I gave a restart instead and ended up in that mess with the eyes...