Mish-gan
Auto-translated
In my opinion, there should be three nominations:
1. Best Multiplayer Map.
2. Best Single-Player Map.
3. Most Original (Unique) Map.
Regulations:
1. Timetable (registration start and end dates, submission start and end dates, voting start and end dates on the website for the submitted maps in each nomination).
2. Participant Registration (participants fill out application forms – a final list of participants is created).
3. Establishing requirements for map creation (including the number of maps from one mapmaker):
3.1. requirements for a multiplayer map (e.g., number of participants, balance, objectives, tasks, terrain, heroes, etc.);
3.2. requirements for a single-player map (e.g., non-linearity of the plot, balance, objectives, terrain, heroes, etc.);
3.3. the selection of the most original (unique) map will take place among all maps participating in the competition (I suggest that they will be evaluated, for example, based on the style and charisma of the map).
4. Creating a page with the submitted maps for testing and evaluation by website visitors. (To maintain suspense, I suggest not showing preliminary results, but displaying them after the voting is completed).
I would like to add that to increase the motivation of mapmakers, it is necessary to come up with some kind of reward!
Many nuances have not been taken into account here, but the overall idea is logical.
Added 1 minute later.
As for the "Mapmaker of the Year," it's too early to talk about it; there are few maps, and among those available this year, the choice is already clear; there is no competition!