The judges' decision regarding the match between Skid Vicious and Lord Nadicus.

Do you understand how ridiculous you look? :)

So that my words are not again called distorted, I will present the facts to the public (I remind you that the organizers consider only their words and the words of the judges to be facts, and the words of the opposition are a priori distorted), i.e., I will present only the words of the organizers and the judges.

Fact #1:

Skid Vicious receives a technical defeat. Lord Nadicus advances to the next round. The decision was made by the judges: Lord Zezuk, DJN.

Reasons: repeated failure to comply with the judges' requirements by player Skid Vicious.

Fact #2:

Player [Skid Vicious] is accused not of not making saves, but of ignoring the judge's request. At the time of the request, at least one save was available. There were no complaints about the number or frequency of saves.

And where is the "repeated" failure? :) No other requirements were presented to me; they are not mentioned here. It turns out that I simply ignored an absurd request from a judge who is not really a judge! :) And this has nothing to do with the reason for my technical defeat. So, is the judges' decision wrong? :)

Third fact:
My defeat in the official tournament table was recorded long before the official decision, which is a gross error by the organizers responsible for filling it out.

Isn't that too many errors in one direction? "I haven't read Pasternak, but I condemn him" (c) :)

Fact #4:

A complaint was received from your opponent that you are a cheater. He also told you this.

Since the judging panel did not recognize me as a cheater, we can conclude that I am not a cheater (damn, how logical :)). In addition, no arguments were presented to me or the public. Therefore, the words of Lord Nadicus are a very serious statement and, in particular, an insult to me as an honest player. Therefore, as a participant (not only as an opponent) in the tournament, I have already filed complaints with the judges DJN and Lord Zezuk via email (although the latter has not yet responded to my previous requests) against the player LordNadicus:
1. Serious insult to player Skid Vicious, i.e., me.
2. The lack of reaction from the judges to baseless accusations of cheating by players in the tournament in an absolutely losing game discredits the organization!
If there is still room for more :)

Now, personally to the organizer oxygen_hl:

Skid Vicious refused to publish personal correspondence with the judging panel.

Why are you asking for permission? Do you have it?