That's why I suggest conducting an independent investigation on our portal. Since anonymity can no longer be maintained, I propose a format where only members of the Arbitration Committee (AK) and the accused can post in a separate thread. And based on this investigation, a decision can be made.

If you know of facts that prove Vitalik's honesty or can clearly refute the existing evidence against him, then do so. Do you really think that during another investigation, the members of the AK will change their opinion to the exact opposite? I have been closely following the discussions on the portal and can confidently say that I have not seen this much negativity per square centimeter of the screen in a long time. And an "independent investigation on our portal" (c) will bring nothing but the aforementioned negativity. Do we need it?