Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Excellent arithmetic, but where will you get 36-50 pikemen in this case? :confused: And building and upgrading archers is necessary in 90+ percent of cases for a normal pace, and if 10 "pokemon" come, will we fight with 24 "pokemon"? :D And there's no need to compare the damage of archers and melee units; they are different things (especially in non-minimal dungeons, for example), let's not forget that.
Valeska will have 24. The starting hero and the hero from the tavern will have 10-20, and there's a growth of 14. In total, a minimum of 34, a maximum of 54. Yes, I agree, the damage of archers and melee damage are different things, but Conflict manages to survive with 10 air elementals and 60 butterflies, and does so quite well. And if we go with pikemen, without archers, then on level 112 we will have swordsmen, and on level 114 we will have horses, which, with offense, can do a lot. And on level 117, we put horses + griffins in the castle, and on level 121 we can easily crush enemies without archers. People are just used to archers and don't understand how you can play something else? But you can and even should experiment.