Rules for Heroes of Might and Magic III online tournaments on HeroesWorld.

Preliminary results (first number - FOR, second - AGAINST):
1. Alex_R - 18-7
2. Mizrael - 19-0
3. LeBron - 20-2
4. Pit for LM - 29-0
5. scorp - 21-0
6. vbn - 26-0
7. Dubrovin Pavel - 21-3

I still don't understand what criteria will be used to select the AC (Advisory Council). :smile32: The voting is ongoing, people are accumulating points, but what happens next?
1. If Dirty had been included in the initial list, in my opinion, he wouldn't have been last in terms of votes. The initial list was simply created based on the first people who responded, which meant that other respected individuals were effectively excluded and had to settle for the "additional list." Because of this, many people are now voting, choosing from the 7 initial candidates, and rarely paying attention to the "additional" ones. It feels wrong. :(
2. How many people should be in the AC? For example, I want there to be 5, while many want 7. Will the number of people in the AC be determined solely by a majority vote? For example, if 20 people vote for an AC consisting of 7 members and 10 people vote for 5 members, then there will be 7. Am I understanding this correctly?
3. How will the "against" votes be taken into account? Let's say one candidate has 7 votes against him and 18 votes for him out of 25 votes. The second candidate has 12 votes for him and no votes against. Who is more preferable? In my opinion, 12-0 is more preferable than 18-7, because the candidate with many "against" votes is, let's say, not respected by a sufficient number of people. I repeat, this is just my opinion.
4. I initially thought I had to vote for someone from the 7 initial candidates. Can I change my decision now?
Sorry if the answers were already here, I think I scrolled through everything, but I might have missed something.

My suggestion is to hold a real, automated vote with buttons for "for" and "against," a large list of ALL the people suggested here, the ability to choose 5 or 7 AC members, and to announce in advance the principle by which the final decision will be made, the exact voting deadlines, and most importantly: to fully define ALL the powers of the AC, its structure of work and actions regarding which cases, and at what specific time the AC's decision must be made + complex situations within the AC itself (let's say, out of 7 members, 3 are unavailable, 1 is for, 1 is against, and 2 abstain. How should decisions be made in such cases? This is just an example; there are many situations).