Sacred Haven of Debauchery

No. I believe that Siv demonstrated himself to be more worthy than the others. At least because in each of his posts, there was an argument specifically related to the dispute, while the main task of the others was to show how bad Siv is and that he made a mistake somewhere. And also to just "make fun of" him. I'm sorry, but that's how it is.

In a debate, two things are important: firstly, the argumentation of one's statements, and secondly, the ability not to resort to personal attacks. If everyone has big problems with the first, then only he resorted to personal attacks, so regarding worthy behavior, it's a big question. Also, in reality, there was practically no trolling there. Some people just like to play with words, to show how advanced they are in online communication.