I was just expressing my personal view on rock music, which leads me to these conclusions.

Well, I was just asking what it's based on.

But punk rock sounds worse compared to Hardcore, Grunge, Indie, and Post-Punk.

No, it doesn't sound worse :p And why am I wrong now?

I'm not saying it's primitive from the point of view of playing an instrument.

Punk was never about "playing an instrument" (and it's not "primitive" at all, especially when we're talking about Lumen), punk is conceptual music, where even a single, well-said word can add incredible flavor to a song. Punk was originally more about the music of feelings/anger/life, or something like that.

Read the other arguments in the Wiki.

I didn't find any articles titled "A Stupid Argument About Which Musical Style is Better." Do you have a link?

Or you can put it this way: Post-Submarine - Aircraft Carrier.

And a post-Aircraft Carrier would be the "Kursk," a submarine filled with vodka.
Here's an example: grape juice. On the one hand, post-grape juice is wine. On the other hand, it's a yellow bodily waste product.
I'm saying that there's good and bad in everything; you just shouldn't confuse being a hardcore fan with striving for perfection.
And eating everything with the "post" prefix is like drinking all kinds of post-juice.