Zybr
Auto-translated
I really don't understand how a coordinator who doesn't understand the section he moderates and to whom many complaints are directed can remain in his position? Naturally, the fact that he was there and, without understanding the problem, made decisions should have led to such a mess, and it did. I repeat my opinion: take the experience of other (much more popular) forums; moderation there is simple: elections are held, candidates are either requested by the public or volunteer (and there are always those who want to, there's no need to whine about how difficult and sad it is). And, as a rule, the most worthy are chosen, and there are fewer conflicts in the sections they moderate. It's simple, and there's no need for long and pointless arguments. IMHO.
I didn't pay attention to this post the first time, but since you repeated it...
Take the time to study the forum before making such statements publicly. What you "suggested" already exists on the forum. And it has been for quite some time. So, it's better to check your arguments before writing them.
As for your misunderstanding, in my opinion, a coordinator shouldn't be too knowledgeable about the section he moderates. He is there to maintain order, stop arguments, and his work is not related to the game at all. Most of those who disagree simply liked to latch onto individual words and phrases in posts, interpreting them in their own way. Hacker was stopping that heatedness. Whether he was successful is another question; after all, it's not easy to do something perfectly.
I don't understand how someone who has been on the forum for 3-4 months can claim to know what's best for it:confused:
Specifically, Wlk777, you pointed out something that had already been done before you, which shows your lack of awareness on this issue.
Барон "Vampires"
Отдай свои прошлые сны,
В сомненьях себя обрети,
В бешеном танце душа кружится!
Не думай, что будет потом,
Здесь и сейчас мы живем,
Стань хоть на миг сам собой, слышишь!