I have a feeling that you are looking for a suitable excuse to make disrespectful remarks about our people.
And the attempt to elevate oneself by trying to belittle others is simply absurd and can only lead to negativity towards both the speaker and their resource, and the product that is being so persistently promoted.
I have been following your statements for many years and respect your achievements.
I hope for understanding.

I don't quite understand these statements. How am I trying to elevate myself?

In the same way, I can claim that Captain, by presenting TE-lite in an unusual way (and, by the way, distorting the facts), is trying to elevate himself. However, I did not do that.

And another important point – practically no one on your side in this thread has written any specific drawbacks of TE-lite. Vague statements are perceived as general slogans of the Soviet principle "I haven't read it, but I condemn it" and "it's probably some kind of nonsense." In the link to the portal that I provided, there is a list of all the differences. Which can be disabled if YOU need to – at the level of rules or completely disabled.

Nobody! Nothing! Has been written about this! At the same time, the line "we don't need it" continues. This, among other things, is also a simple disrespect for those who promote TE and simply for the interlocutor. How do you want me to personally treat this? With respect and understanding? :)

In general, we won't get anywhere like this. I apologize, but this conversation is very unconstructive. If you don't want to play on TE, even in the reduced form in which it was offered for the match, no one will force you. However, until there are well-reasoned arguments about the differences that cannot be fixed, which are a sufficient reason for refusal, I will personally perceive this correspondence exclusively as excuses.

And for now, the result is that 30 people will play 40-60 games, and in most of them, time will be wasted on extra mouse clicks to transfer troops and detach units.