What is your opinion about Heroes IV?

Dr Motor;200996

Okay, fine, the lack of special abilities is a drawback, but in the same Heroes III, in Tournaments, some heroes are penalized solely because of their special ability. And the progression in Heroes IV is much more interesting – with pure experience, you need 98 levels compared to 24 in Heroes III. And the classes are a great thing.
In my opinion, the most interesting skill system is in Heroes V.

The most interesting progression is in Heroes V. One main skill at level 3, and 3 additional skills at level 1. And there is a large variety of combinations. But here, there is just too much variety. And here, you can level up and level up, but it's monotonous.

What's the basis for that? Morale is subject to a certain rule: two heroes of different races in the same army incur a morale penalty. I don't remember exactly how it works right now, but if I'm not mistaken, two heroes of neighboring races deduct 2 morale points from each other, and if you add a third hero of a different race from your city to this army, this third hero receives a -5 morale penalty because he will not be adjacent to one of the two initial heroes. And if the races are completely opposite (e.g., undead and life), the penalty is -7, as far as I remember.
And doesn't Heroes III have morale penalties? Explanation for the "experienced player": mixing races always incurs a morale penalty!

I meant that morale is much more convenient and easier to understand in Heroes III than in Heroes IV. For example: the same race +1, 2 races 0, 3 races -1, undead -1, and that's it. It's tasty, cheap, convenient, and completely unparalleled.