I was actually talking about real chess.
How is that inappropriate?

How can you compare the "graphics" of a real game and a virtual game?

But the argument started because of the graphics! They say that the graphics in the fifth game are great, so the game is great, and I play it, but the graphics in the fourth game are terrible, so I don't play it, which means the game is terrible.

Not at all. I (like, probably, all Heroes fans) don't think that graphics are the most important thing in games. And no one compared it to the fifth game, because the level of technology is completely different. I said that I simply don't like the design of the fourth part.

The Wanderer certainly didn't express himself in a very "politically correct" way.

And yet they say that the criticism of the fourth game is not well-founded...:smile40:

The fifth game is pop music.

Heroes have never been and can never be pop music. It's a well-known game, but not a pop game. The genre is specific. A shooter, an MMO can be pop music... but not a TBS.

Of course, even though the castles in the fourth game are not as detailed, you can easily find any building by its appearance, but in the fifth game, you'll get tired of looking for it (spinning the camera:D).

But why look for it when it's easier to click on the corresponding button?

You just called half the forum idiots, including me.

Less than half the forum. But the Wanderer definitely called more than half of them spoiled brats and ninth-graders:D

The game should be good both inside and out.

+1:)

For games of this genre, graphics at the level of the third game are quite enough. IMHO.

I don't agree with that, but you're right about something: it would be better if the graphics in the fourth game were completely 2D, it would look better.
P.S. nonsense