Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
By "emergency," I meant – if you know how your opponent feels about this type of magic.
I don't understand you. How can an opponent "feel" about it? Like, if they're afraid of it, you should invest in it, and if they're not, you shouldn't?
There are few ways to achieve victory.
This phrase is a real riddle. Maybe you meant there are few chances of winning? I.e., when there are many or average chances, you stick to the classic approach. But when there are few, you invest in what will be most effective? Oh my god.
But investing in it without a reason would be foolish.
I can't wrap my head around it :( And again, not a single counter-argument :( My friend, all means are fair in war. Non-standard development usually happens in a long game, or with luck in a medium/short game. When we're talking about 2-3 sworn enemies, it already implies that the game has dragged on, which means there's a chance to develop dark magic and find spells. Then, you just need to be able to apply them. You can find a decent set of dark magic spells in 4 out of 8 cities, so the problem is more likely to be with the skill appearing, rather than finding a secondary skill with the right guild.
