chudo_ud0
Auto-translated
Now that’s something constructive. I didn’t say the rules were wrong. It’s just a small nuance (or, as I called it, a flaw – words, words... :). I provided arguments as to why, in my opinion, similar options should be avoided in the future. If I receive a response without an explanation as to why my option is not even being considered, then I don’t see any reason to continue playing.
However, I think the forum is designed to test various points of view. If you respond with arguments, for example, stating that it was introduced to make the game more interesting for weaker players, then that’s some kind of logic. There’s no need to take criticism as an attack; criticism doesn’t mean that everything needs to be changed immediately. It’s simply needed to avoid misunderstandings in the future and improve some aspect of the game. And also, hundreds may not notice, but one person will, and then those hundreds will agree with them.