Nagan-4
Auto-translated
2 Adelaide, 2 Loi.
Sorry for interrupting your conversation. Let's say you both fulfill your obligations, and what will we gain from it?
In the end, we'll lose the seasonal tournament on fixed maps (and I'll especially lose out because I love good fixed maps more than random ones) and lose a promising and interesting tournament that Loi organizes. Do we really need this?
And what's even worse, we'll lose two enthusiastic tournament organizers. That's probably a very unfavorable trade.
I would suggest a compromise.
With Adelaide's consent, I will refine the rules of the seasonal tournament on fixed maps to approximately the level of the rules currently used for random maps, and I will present it for discussion among the players, perhaps in the summer, in June. And in the fall (believe me, time flies), we will hold an official fixed-map tournament, a big one, as befits a decent resource. We will encourage players, recruit 24 people, and not those who drop out of the tournament immediately after signing up, but normal, serious people.
Although the resource is young, it's time to establish decent traditions.
Adelaide traditionally holds these tournaments; I've read old threads, and many people were grateful to her for the championships. It's not easy for a player who usually plays 5-player games to run a 3-player championship. For example, it would not be easy for me to run a 5-player tournament, so her efforts should be appreciated.
Personally, I didn't have any issues during the process; I played a match with an opponent, and we quickly agreed on everything. I think we can agree on everything with Uran as well. But if you set out to create conflict, you can find fault with any comma.
At the same time, I agree with Loi and Dirty Player that the forum is growing very quickly, and what was acceptable half a year or a year ago is now outdated.
In general, it's a normal working moment. I think that vbn and other players are ready to work on the tournament in the future and provide as much help as possible to the organizer. I emphasize, concrete help, and not just writing that everything is bad.
Overall, the resource is growing and maturing quickly; there are always growing pains, but they are easily overcome. With respect!
Sorry for interrupting your conversation. Let's say you both fulfill your obligations, and what will we gain from it?
In the end, we'll lose the seasonal tournament on fixed maps (and I'll especially lose out because I love good fixed maps more than random ones) and lose a promising and interesting tournament that Loi organizes. Do we really need this?
And what's even worse, we'll lose two enthusiastic tournament organizers. That's probably a very unfavorable trade.
I would suggest a compromise.
With Adelaide's consent, I will refine the rules of the seasonal tournament on fixed maps to approximately the level of the rules currently used for random maps, and I will present it for discussion among the players, perhaps in the summer, in June. And in the fall (believe me, time flies), we will hold an official fixed-map tournament, a big one, as befits a decent resource. We will encourage players, recruit 24 people, and not those who drop out of the tournament immediately after signing up, but normal, serious people.
Although the resource is young, it's time to establish decent traditions.
Adelaide traditionally holds these tournaments; I've read old threads, and many people were grateful to her for the championships. It's not easy for a player who usually plays 5-player games to run a 3-player championship. For example, it would not be easy for me to run a 5-player tournament, so her efforts should be appreciated.
Personally, I didn't have any issues during the process; I played a match with an opponent, and we quickly agreed on everything. I think we can agree on everything with Uran as well. But if you set out to create conflict, you can find fault with any comma.
At the same time, I agree with Loi and Dirty Player that the forum is growing very quickly, and what was acceptable half a year or a year ago is now outdated.
In general, it's a normal working moment. I think that vbn and other players are ready to work on the tournament in the future and provide as much help as possible to the organizer. I emphasize, concrete help, and not just writing that everything is bad.
Overall, the resource is growing and maturing quickly; there are always growing pains, but they are easily overcome. With respect!
