he. attacks on an opponent signify a poverty and
exhaustion of the stock of arguments. Is that not so?
to preserve spiritual foundations, it is not at all necessary to know which line to use for underlining adjectives.
and what do you even mean by preserving spiritual foundations? knowledge of classical literature? kindness to one's neighbor? aversion to adultery and gluttony?
well, that's just sci-fi nonsense. it will be harder to get a job as a loader, but mystical machines themselves are capable of nothing. they need maintenance, they cannot perform complex work, etc., and so on.
and if you compare the demand for accountants, economists, programmers, and other bureaucrats with the demand for Russian language teachers, you might be surprised by the total dominance of the former.
investments, loans, trading, turnover, contracts, business in general—that is mathematics. so...
no... business, yes—mathematics... but the foundations of business are contracts and negotiations, and then, if they have a successful outcome, come investments, etc.
why are you shouting? relying on the volume of your statements? and sudoku forces one to perform calculations. no one said it was very difficult. so what? but it specifically strains spatial thinking.
The best thing I know for developing spatial thinking is origami lessons, if you like... creativity also develops it...
I never thought this would be a mystery to a medal winner. in your opinion, the brain is a homogeneous puddle of gray matter? then you'd better read a middle school biology textbook. mathematics was created) and books, "they were always there"? or did they arise from thin air? and speech too? or maybe the gods sent them from heaven? everything except natural sciences was created artificially in this world, baby. and to organize natural principles and patterns for oneself, mathematics was created—as a Rampart of rationalism. and to organize the sounds produced by the larynx and oral cavity, to use them to designate phenomena and objects, speech was created.
I am not your "baby," you could get punched in the eye for that... it's impolite of you in an argument...
sigh... please build me a model of a world where there are no languages, but there is mathematics... would that even be life... on the contrary, one can imagine that...
The first book in school will still be the primer...
essays and phrases become more complex not at all from mindless drilling of commas and studying complex sentence types. they become more complex over time, mainly thanks to simple literature. and also they depend on one's worldview and state of mind at the current moment of life. spelling, punctuation—merely a toolkit. just as buying a pruning saw doesn't make you a Moldovan foreman. I finished school without any medals and with a C in chemistry. but I was always quick-witted. I won Olympiads. perhaps my mind is from my father; he is a gold medalist. and so what? anyone could get a medal by cramming and "grinding" their studies. a crude word, but very fitting for this context. and why? I look at my father, and I see—the medal gave him nothing. if I talk to him about something philosophical, or reason about something, he cannot sustain the conversation. because his mind is unsophisticated, and his gaze is sergeant-straight. and he certainly doesn't earn millions.
how do the Japanese program robots? how do programmers write programs? everything here is built on mathematics.
parrying is simple as pie... and poetry and prose, yes, are limited only by the poverty of language. a simplest example—the painstaking search for the right word/rhyme. language is rich, but not omnipotent.
:smile07: you wrote something stupid, and I merely commented on it... as for the painstaking search... that can also be said about solving certain mathematical problems and calculations...
far from limitless. I repeat, everything is limited only by the poverty of language. there are a certain number of words in it. and they can be used in different ways. but they are not an infinite set.
and I will take the advice not to become a robot when I write my new story,
thanks.
It's not about an infinite set... nothing in the universe possesses this quality—everything is finite... it's stupid to consider language optional because of this fact... numbers also possess infinity, and periodicity exists only in words... keep writing... although if a person struggles to find a rhyme, then they shouldn't write at all, as the rhyme should be born naturally without mechanical selection...
logic..
what does it matter that you copied an article from Wikipedia?
as well as someone else's statements?
recently you spoke of the boundlessness of perceptions. meaning the definition should not exhaust your idea? logic is rationalism. rationalism is mathematics. this is an axiom. and people who know a language but stutter and painfully search for words in conversation—is that not the triumph of irrationality? they cannot construct a sentence, although they know many words.
This isn't an article, it's a definition... where everything is clearly written... and my quotes are favorites and on topic... you wanted a lively argument yourself... but I think you don't analyze them at all... what a waste... terrible is the arguer who cannot imagine themselves on the other side of the barricades... and a smart person will never reproach another for citing sources...
Unlike you, I cannot give definitions out of thin air when it contradicts the truth... everyone has their own perceptions... and logic too... I gave you logic from the perspective of language... rationalism is, I believe, the science of logical reasoning, right? that's what you meant in this sense... but reasonings can be not only mathematical, but also linguistic or even combined... well, try to prove a theorem without saying a word... people suffering from such diseases are beyond mockery... it's damage to the nervous system; they know sign languages... blind people have writing—because no human being can live in total absence of communication in any form...
...mathematics is not exhausted by formulas at all. for the same reason I draw your attention to the fact that this is, first and foremost, rationalism, and you, instead of putting smileys and haphazardly hyperbolizing, would be better off bringing real arguments in your favor. my "rationalism" is expressed in the fact that I engage in arts, adore Eastern culture, master the katana and staff—that is, everything written in the profile
If you don't see real arguments, it's only because you don't want to see anything but yourself and your ideas... I smiled a couple of times pointing out contradictions in your reasonings, and you flared up like fire immediately... not very samurai-like, those who keep their thoughts cold and calm... commenting slightly on your statements as in any ordinary discussion, I move to reasoning... you haven't even brought real arguments in your favor yet... "mastering the katana and staff"—I feel that when you master them, I will challenge you to a duel... I practiced with a pole for 5 years; my father taught nunchaku... it would also be interesting to see your katana...
P.S. I think out of the two of us, only I so far accept that both sciences are as important in our time as air... but you will never convince me of the exclusive superiority of mathematics, treating language as secondary to human development, especially with such meager examples... well, your arguments just don't impress me...

