Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
To be honest, this post is no different from the previous one (yours) and it doesn't really explain why Necropolis is stronger. With the same confidence, one could say: Tower is stronger because of the Mages, Djinns, and Nagas. Because you don't consider: growth, strategy, etc. - you just compare units. And there will always be arguments about the superiority of one unit over another.
I'm just refuting the opinion that Necropolis is stronger. In both posts. I believe that it is a strong Castle, thanks to its numbers and a number of other abilities. In this post, I just wanted to remind you that the Castle also has a number of simply wonderful features. And I just expressed my opinion. And I'm not just comparing units, but simply presenting a possible battle between these units. I was just a little surprised that many people in this thread are discussing whether Necropolis has any weaknesses. I wanted to show that one Necropolis army is not enough. You need to be able to manage them well. With unskilled management and tactics (possibly even the one I mentioned), the Castle has a better chance of winning
Спортсменом можешь ты не быть, но пыль в глаза пустить обязан!