Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
As with all discussions about units of the same level, it's difficult to choose which one is better, just like comparing an archer and a warrior – they are DIFFERENT.
But still, I would highlight the "storm" unit :-). It has very powerful attack for a level 2 unit. I don't know if one shot from a storm is as good as two shots from an archer, but in close combat, the archer simply starts to disappear before your eyes, unlike the storm – and that's a significant advantage for the elemental.
So, I'm for the storm.
For defending a castle, I would highly recommend battle dwarves; they are very durable and like to defend against magic, and it's not easy to run away from them, and it's not so easy to take a castle defended by a good stack of dwarves, especially if there are also dryads.