Stay alive!!!

Nothing to worry about. We all can be sharp sometimes. But it's worth remembering the good intentions. :) Qwerty, you're misplacing the emphasis.

Are some Clans trying to get rid of their members? When they're in the top positions, they're praised, but when they do something "wrong," they're told to deal with it themselves...? What's the reason for the concern? Are you unsure about your Clan members? Then just tell them directly – you're not sure about them, and you don't want to be responsible for them. Or is the selection process for the Clan... spontaneous?

The emphasis needs to be placed differently (and I've written about this, but there are no clear criteria): I'm ready to take responsibility for the actions of Clan members (like any leader), if the violations of these members relate to Clan/inter-Clan activities. And even then, it's more of an internal matter. For all other cases, violations of the portal rules result in warnings and a ban for the specific user. I can't control "other" cases, and no one has given me the authority (control over every word a person says, their behavior). I said "if you mean" and "I suspect." You know my attitude towards LZMС. And we know what the attitude of others is towards LZMС. And an interaction body is indeed needed – but its goal should be precisely interaction (for example, holding tournaments – is that interaction? yes), and perhaps conflict resolution (although this could also be the primary goal). P.S. I understand you, as they said in that silly advertisement. When you encounter sharp rejection of ideas that, in your opinion, are very good, excellent, and will work, you can get upset. However, at the same time, it's worth listening to the criticism of those around you, who may not always see the truth, who have their own, often incorrect views, and who argue with you. Truth is born in debate – and that's the truth. I wrote this not so much to you, because I know you already know everything, but for the others... who are a little too eager