[HMM III OFF TOURNAMENT] "Race for the Leader"

I don't understand something... Why are you all averaging all 36? It's silly to average all 36??? I think that for the first campaign, there should be one rating, a winner is determined, and then everything is reset, the next campaign is played, there's a new winner, and so on! And at the end of all seven campaigns, the rating is summed up... Correct me if I'm wrong???

P.S.: I'm not arguing about the reason... but 10% isn't that much. 800 - 10% = 720, well, you could make it 5%! I just said 10% as a rough estimate...
For example, it was the same with those who missed one stage of the Blitz Tournament or the War of Champions. It was even tougher!!!

When calculating according to my system, there is no resetting of the rating after each stage. Since it is called the current rating, it should reflect the current picture of the player (at a given time), there is no need to look for flaws in the system, you just need to play (and also learn) and demonstrate your excellent game. I simply won't allow someone, by looking for flaws in the system, to try to become the ABSOLUTE LEADER; if you want to win, you just need to participate and win. With respect, K0Lb@zzeR.

Added after 2 hours 30 minutes
P.S. So, gentlemen, let's not dwell on the past, but only on the present, I repeat once again, the PRESENT, and of course, let's think about the future.