Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I wanted to reply, but everything has already been said for me :) Thank you, Sir AmberSoler.
Night Nazgul;145501
Luck is better, in my opinion. Example:
A) We have a well-developed Defense skill: our troops attack, they are repelled. Then they attack again, and are not repelled. Unless, of course, it's griffins. ;)
B) We have a well-developed Luck skill: our troops hit, deal more damage => the counterattack will be smaller, which is already very good. And if they attack griffins, they won't even get a second counterattack. ;)
Bad example. In almost all cases, you can remove the counterattack in advance with a single unit, and not take any damage at all. In the worst case, you can simply blind the monster ;)
Reiter
