Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
This point doesn't work because the creator themselves isn't around for even longer periods... so no one is monitoring it.
Sorry, Yura... but I disagree with you here... Many moderators haven't been active for a long time. The list of moderators with their work schedule was created by the Creator in the summer, which means he already knew about the moderators' activity back then, and it was already clear that most of them hadn't been on the forum since March or April. There's no need to talk about it; just look at the sections themselves and see when these users last moderated. So, a decision could have been made back then about whether it was appropriate to keep these people in their moderator positions! The Admin promised us changes back in the summer. Now it's January. I'm not talking about any major changes that would really take a lot of time, but I still think it's possible to find some time to update the list of moderators and add new ones.
As for the number of moderators, I think 2 per section would be enough – they could cover each other's work! However, Alan has already expressed his opinion on this, so I won't repeat myself!
"Как это странно всегда.. Вроде бы взрослые люди, А в голове ерунда.. Мечтаем как дети о чуде.."