Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I suggest making the strength of reputation increase/decrease (reputation meter) dependent on:
The number of reputation points (e.g., +1 for each "badge").
The number of posts (e.g., +1 for every 200 posts).
The time since registration (+1 for each year).
For example, if a new user has fewer than 200 posts, a negative or zero reputation, and hasn't been registered for a year, they CAN give a positive or negative rating, but the strength of their reputation meter will be 0. In other words, they can express agreement or disagreement with a forum member's post, but they won't be able to influence the reputation until they become more familiar with the forum.
P.S.: With this system, it would be better if authors received their first "badge" not for +1 reputation, but for at least +10, because it's currently too easy to get one.
P.P.S.: Of course, all of this needs to be refined. :)