Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Even since Heroes 3 (or perhaps even earlier, as my acquaintance with the series began with the third installment), cities are divided into production-focused (army) and income-generating (money) types, with magic sometimes being another consideration for development.
Moreover, in Heroes 3, this distinction is even more pronounced, as even the starting (production) city is not advantageous to develop primarily for income (unlike secondary cities) – this conflicts with the pace of building production facilities.
In Heroes 5, due to the limit on building levels, developing production does not conflict with income in the starting city (unfortunately), but nevertheless, the division into income-generating and production-focused cities is still relevant for secondary cities.
Why should all cities be production-focused and aim for a complete buyout of all resources?
And why should all tiers be built and purchased immediately in production cities?
This can only be explained by the desire to extract the absolute maximum from all cities, but then the question arises: why should this be easy or even achievable?
Разработчик Heroes 5.5 WarGame Edition. Сайт проекта - пока неактивен Автор Асимметричных шахмат