Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Raper, it's quite possible that these discussions have already taken place, but nothing has been explained to EVERYONE yet.
Perhaps it was explained to those who were on the forum a year or two ago, but so what? Are you saying that because you've been on the forum longer than I have, your word is law, and mine isn't worth anything? That's an interesting approach.
I won't argue, I'll just try to read between the lines:
In general, I'm concerned about the following:
For the past month, you've been having a rather lengthy dispute on the forum with "those you don't want to mention"...
Tell me, isn't the issue of collective responsibility about turning personal squabbles from the forum into the "Clans" Rules, rather than, say, in chat, ICQ, or PMs? In other words, if you, for example, give kj1313 three warnings, for example, for stealing your "eagle" without any clear reason to you, can this be grounds for disbanding "Knights of the Apocalypse," which participates in tournaments and has a clan game rating?
P.S. I ask the mentioned individuals and clans not to be offended; I'm just trying to understand the meaning of this clause in the Rules.