Ment
Auto-translated
Interesting...
Well, it's impossible to avoid subjectivity here, because objectively, you just need to divide by two; the math doesn't lie. But without additional restrictions or weighting coefficients, it will be difficult for voters.
And why hysteresis, and where did the formula come from? It looks good, although I would use a less gradual logarithm (5 out of 34 seems a bit small to me; I would take 7).
Well, it's impossible to avoid subjectivity here, because objectively, you just need to divide by two; the math doesn't lie. But without additional restrictions or weighting coefficients, it will be difficult for voters.
And why hysteresis, and where did the formula come from? It looks good, although I would use a less gradual logarithm (5 out of 34 seems a bit small to me; I would take 7).