You used to play as Barbarians! :)
.
By the way, in my opinion, the rush tactic in the situation you described doesn't work.
Even if a Barbarian with 2 Ogres and, say, 9 Imps defeats a Rampart army, the losses will be catastrophic - losing one Ogre is not the same as, say, 10 Elves - it hurts, but it's bearable.
.
I believe that the main strength of the Stronghold lies in quickly exploring the entire map, capturing as many Castles and resources as possible. Only then does the Barbarian have a chance to win. After all, the fact that the 7th level is built in the first week already says a lot...
.
In that case, you should take Dess, but I usually took Craig or Gundula :) Maybe that's why I kept losing :)
i.e., by the time of the final battle, when the Barbarians have finally gathered all their troops, even buying slow and weak units and go into the last battle, they will most likely have more troops than the Castle or Rampart.
And it's very convenient to clear the map of neutrals with just Ogres and Imps - the battles take place with almost no losses.
.
Added 14 minutes ago
2 Kor
Yes, the statistics are depressing.... but on the other hand, what is a Barbarian Castle? For me, it's not just a Castle, but also the heroes. And no one doubts that Barbarian heroes have very bright representatives. When playing as Barbarians, I don't think you should focus on one Castle. With Barbarians, you can only take heroes, Ogres, and Imps.
.
And the rest in other Castles. For me, a rush is not always capturing an enemy Castle in the first week. Rather, it's a quick development that makes further play pointless. For example, if I take the Dragon Utopia in the early stages of the game, I can call it a rush. You can win without fighting.
I think that based on the numbers, we can say that Inferno is not doing any better.
I didn't understand why :confused: But, apparently, there is something cunning in Inferno after all.... :smile19: