Ment
Auto-translated
Given that the fight did occur, we can assume that:
1. The father had immunity on the first night;
2. And/or all or some of the mafia members were clearly not immune players.
"Covering with protections" sounds very cool, but how does the father's immunity or lack thereof, as well as the father's action or inaction, affect the number of immune players in the mafia overall? Two of them naturally have protection, and the third (the hypocrite) is what he is. Yes, you can protect him with a monster if he has no immunity, but you know, it's one thing to have a chance of the mafia hitting *some* mafia member, and another to protect a specific one, even if he's immune, when there's no reason and skipping the kill is a bad move.