Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
That's why I wrote about open slave owners versus those who keep it a secret. Think about it: why would an Arteryian character work with (or even for) someone like that without a very good reason? And there isn't really a reason (unless he himself is a slave), considering that the player organization is far from the only employer in this world. A fanatical character would try to free the slaves. A non-fanatical one would simply find another job. Not every character will take on just any task without giving it some thought. For example, in a conflict between two countries, one of which is where the character's family lives, it would be strange for him to support the other side if he loves his parents. It would also be strange for an Arteryian to take on quests against Reginalve in such situations, unless he is some kind of very special heresiarch.
Okay, I suppose I agree. I'm waiting for comments from Locken, to see if he's an open slave owner or not (otherwise, I might have to choose a dynastic religion instead of the Arteryian one... No, formally, I would become even stronger that way, but I still don't really want to, I've already settled on it and included it in the quest).