Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
It's foolish to rely solely on buffs, as the strength of creatures is relative to each other.
You can buff 95% of the weaker creatures, or you can nerf 5% of the strongest.
Where is the change minimal? Obviously, in the second case.
There are obvious overpowered units, like Sylvan archers, elite crossbowmen, and elite vampires – you can't just leave them as they are.
But what if the damage of Sylvan archers was not 8-9, but 20-30, or elite vampires stunned with 100% certainty – would you also need to upgrade the others to the same level?
Разработчик Heroes 5.5 WarGame Edition. Сайт проекта - пока неактивен Автор Асимметричных шахмат