Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I'd like to add my two cents.
Griffins are definitely better than Monks, that's a given. Anyone who doubts this should play The Witcher 3; there, a griffin is a boss that two powerful heroes struggle to defeat. How can you compare this monster to an ordinary warrior with magical skills?
I would even phrase the question differently: Griffins > Knights? In Warcraft 3, for example, a griffin rider costs more than a regular knight. On the other hand, here we have just a griffin, without a rider, but still...
Bears are definitely better than Bone Throwers. They are stronger even in the original game, even though their tier is formally lower. But Bears > Priests is debatable; I would say they are roughly equal.
Hydras are definitely better than Witches. A witch is just a small person with a whip; she simply cannot stand on tier 6 physically. Her health is incomparable, and no magic can fix that. If we are talking about exceptionally powerful magical characters, then it's the heroes themselves, and certainly not ordinary human units. Because heroes are invulnerable; you can't even physically attack them, unlike witches. As for the hydra, it's a giant monster; let's not forget that it's a tier 7 unit in Heroes 3 and 4 (and the second-to-last tier in Heroes 2, if I remember correctly).
The closest analogue to a hydra in terms of size and power is a war elephant, which is clearly a much more serious threat than a knight (and the hydra's tier is lower, which is funny).
Centaurs are obviously better than Orcs. A centaur is physically much larger and more agile. In fact, it's light cavalry, its place is somewhere near a knight, with a correction for being lighter (about twice as weak), but definitely not in the lower tiers. Therefore, I would say that Centaurs > Shamans as well.
Разработчик Heroes 5.5 WarGame Edition. Сайт проекта - пока неактивен Автор Асимметричных шахмат