Originally, what was the purpose of criticism? To motivate someone to become better, to draw attention to their mistakes.

After the reviews, no matter what they were like, unfinished or overlooked aspects of the mod always come to light. I try to focus especially on the negative aspects because there is a greater chance that the author will fix them. I tried not to focus on the negative, and then the mod author didn't fix any mistakes at all.

If you only want to talk about the bad, do a follow-up review of the updated RPW; there is really something to criticize, with broad opportunities for criticism.

I haven't watched it, so I can't judge what's there and how it is.

"textures" are just images on a framework, and the shape is determined by the model; please don't confuse them or mislead people.

I didn't go into details; I think the average viewer or player understood me. And that's the most important thing.

Mods involve effort in one way or another (if there are no special programs, then it's simply a colossal amount of work), so negating it with your opinion is not very fair.

I don't know if you've noticed, but lately I've been more lenient towards the mod author's mistakes than before. Regarding opinions, everyone can express them, so I honestly try to express what I like and what I don't. If you don't like the presentation, there's always a solution: you can make your own review of the mod where all the thoughts are expressed correctly. I wouldn't want the reviews to turn into mere praise without highlighting the shortcomings. If you follow the phrase "...negating it with your opinion is not very fair," then all reviews will be not entirely objective.

Mod creators are creative people, so they will be sensitive to other people's opinions.

Creating guides is also a creative process. Therefore, all the impulses of creative nature are familiar to me.

Parasitizing on the game is an attempt to make money from its content.

A small remark about mods: I hardly earn anything from them. If you want to chat on Skype during a stream, we can look at the donation program and see how much has been donated for mod reviews. Then we'll go to YouTube monetization, and I'll show how much was earned from each mod review video. I assure you that the majority of the earnings came from campaign playthroughs and scenarios.

discussing your videos is also an expression of opinion; what else were you saying about democracy? We are not violating anything. Against the background of these words, posts in the group "look, these modders are offended" look strange.

You have expressed what you wanted, and so have I. You can say anything, anywhere, about anything, so a post in the group is also freedom of speech (the only exception would be the restrictions of the legislation of the country where you live). I want to share my observations with the viewers.

Added 12 minutes ago
I'm glad that we're going off-topic, but I think it's better to do such things in private messages. Moreover, each of you can express everything you think about me on the stream. We can arrange this through private messages on HeroesWorld.