Speaking generally about streamers, it's a sensitive issue: some of them, despite having a million-strong audience, advertise questionable or outright fraudulent projects based on the principle that "money doesn't smell."

But this doesn't make these streamers scammers. Or, in response to an advertising offer, are you suggesting that they should be required to demand the organization's financial documents? That's absurd. The fact that some kind of initial internal censorship is necessary, because the streamer is advertising this in their own name, is true. But this censorship is purely individual.
If the aforementioned 1xBet is a scam, and not just a heavily promoted bookmaker forced to operate outside of Russian law, then the affected topic starter (or someone from their friends and acquaintances) could have written that: they tried to withdraw funds, but were ignored (and I quite possibly believe this - I just don't have that information, and it's not in the initial post either).
And, essentially, the topic starter made unsubstantiated claims, without any evidence, equating Hellight (and before that, Redwait had a banner) with scammers. And that's already a specific personal attack.
And who should be brought to a "court of honor" if the topic starter's "honor" allows them to groundlessly accuse anyone of anything.
All of this looks more like some kind of smear campaign. And a personal one at that. Either they were banned... Or they lost...