Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
The 8th stage of the annual John Van Caneghem Tournament (2007).
1. General rules for tournaments take precedence – I hope you won’t argue with that.
By registering for a tournament, a participant undertakes to comply with the rules stated in the first post of the topic and only those, and not the general rules.
3. If a specific tournament has restrictions on the general rules, this point must be clearly stated in the form of a prohibition. There also seems to be nothing contradictory to logic in my statement.
And this prohibition is stated, because from the point of view of mathematical logic, the phrase
it is also not allowed to buy heroes who died in battle
means a ban on buying ANY heroes who died. Of course, we don’t always formulate our thoughts mathematically strictly. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify with the organizers whether you understood them correctly.
I don’t want to argue, but I just refer you again to my post #117, where it is indicated that there is no prohibition, because by default, buying enemy heroes is allowed.
The Law cannot have a "default"; it is clearly stated in the first post. And your disagreement cannot be an argument until the organizers confirm it.
This is about logic. I hope you will not have difficulty understanding these four points and at least admit that my position is valid, because it is quite justified.
Your position is justified from the point of view of your life logic; from the point of view of mathematical logic, you are DEFINITELY WRONG, and the ban exists. How to resolve such a conflict of approaches is up to the organizers, although they should have provided better explanations.
It would be funny to see comments now about me violating the rules, referring to the "bold dot"...
You really violated the rules, and the "bold dot" is important here. And if I were the organizer, I would ask you to resend the save, because there was still a lot of time. In case of refusal, I would credit you with the basic (level 1, without artifacts) amount of parameters.