Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

I wrote about this before; the Kamikaze system came about as a result of our debate. He simply had the idea of varying the ratio of damage and range. But I didn't like 50x50.

What ratio do you think Kamikaze uses now?

As a system for calculating points to determine the winner in a tournament, it's basically fine. But I'm asking you about the overall player ranking on the forum?

If the systems remain cumulative, then the flaws of each one are much less significant than the fact that they reflect not so much the player's skill, but rather their activity. Therefore, I would be happy with any existing system to which a differentiation of tournaments by prestige and strength is added, so as to somehow offset the accumulation. In general, we should ask ourselves what the rating should reflect: skill or activity.
And we should approach the determination of the winner of the War of Kings more thoroughly (because there are exactly 10 stages), but do it in advance. Now, misunderstandings are inevitable.

I think we should just calculate the rating using your system because no one else will do it for us.

2Sage
A practical approach.