Favorites, into battle! - 11.

Draws due to inactivity are complete nonsense. A player who hasn't played a single game will end up higher than someone who has played all possible games and lost.

I suggest you think for more than a minute before writing.
How can one get draws due to inactivity in all games? What level of inertia must the other players have?

A player who skips 1-2 games and loses the rest will be higher than someone who has played all possible games and lost.

I suggest you think even longer.
How could the second player lose all games if the first player, who lost everything, is in their group, including at least one game against the second player? This means they either received a loss against the second player due to inactivity.

In general, you are discussing deeply theoretical situations that I don't even plan to allow.
As the tournament organizer, I expect that in practice, two completely inactive players will be disqualified by me. It doesn't matter how many draws they have or how many points they get.
And I already said this above. I can't imagine how this could not happen. If you see such a scenario, provide examples, examples, write examples.

Two topics were discussed a little above.
1) Agreed draw. Merlin is the ideologue - all draws should be canceled. My response - go ahead, cancel them. Dirty appears - nothing needs to be canceled. I think the topic is closed.
2) Draw of inactives. Dirty is the ideologue. My response - disqualifying both makes it irrelevant how many points the inactives receive. Dirty's response - but giving points to inactives is absurd! My response - disqualifying both makes it irrelevant how many points the inactives receive #2. I hope the topic is closed.