Auto-translated
I believe that creating polls for every whim is a bad practice. Rules can change, but not based on someone's "desires." Someone has another "brilliant" idea. They post it on the forum, someone expresses "support," and the rest remain disgustedly silent (explaining to each such "innovator" that the idea is worthless is quite tiring). They take this as approval and say, "Let's vote!"
Therefore, the right approach is this: If someone decides to seriously and permanently initiate a change to any rule (whether it's banning heroes, restructuring, or modifying the mechanics of skills or spells), they should put a lot of effort into it. First, they should gain the support of at least 50 players (with 50+ ranked games each). Then, they can approach the forum coordinator, who opens an official discussion followed by a vote (in which the votes of those who have played at least 50+ ranked games will be taken into account). This would be a serious approach.
Until then, all these "wishes" and "polls" are just empty chatter. And the organizers of official tournaments should adhere to the standard rules by default (participants can agree to play with changes).
Of course, this does not apply to independent tournaments, sponsored tournaments, and the like, such as those organized by Armag or Yar. In this case, the organizer sets the rules and is not obliged to consult with anyone.
"There's no need to execute me,sir Davos . I'll be dead before dawn."
ICQ 716748479
ICQ 716748479