Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
What did we have? We had 4 ways to calculate the Buchholz score: the most primitive one (from Kamikaze) - which, of course, was not seriously considered. 2 software calculations, in which 0.5 is given for an unplayed game in the Buchholz calculation - the calculation provided by my program and the calculation provided by the Dirty program. And finally - a manual calculation, in which 1 point is given for a draw, and not 0.5. The last option was also quickly rejected because it gave the same top three players as the Dirty program, or the same top three as my program - the whole question is how to calculate the Buchholz score for twaryna.
Dirty_Player
I'll explain what the fuss was about. In the old version, the program breaks up pairs a couple of times and, when calculating the coefficient, assigns a draw against itself. At the same time, players could meet each other again. And in the latest version, the program does not break up pairs, but assigns a conditional draw to the players and calculates based on this. P.S.: +0.5 or +1 makes no difference, the order of the ranking is the same, I checked. The overall table is also attached.
Could you explain for the less tech-savvy, using Redwhait as an example, how the Buchholz coefficient is calculated manually? If I'm not mistaken, Redwhait has no free wins or free losses.