Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
1v1 just isn't fun on poorly designed maps or in marathon games...
Well, you're also suggesting that there should only be 2 players, without any AI or other options... What's the point of Civ then?
You can play with three, you know. In "Horn of the Abyss".
You can.
Considering the problems that arose when trying to get people to play Talisman, it's not any easier.
Are you talking about technical issues? Well, I don't know, I haven't tried it. Maybe it is, but it seemed to me that the creators of Civ are less clumsy in this regard.
The third game is objectively the best.
Only the second one, and only on hardcore difficulty!