Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.
I think you've read the previous discussions, so you know that I support the idea of rewarding first-place finishes. I understand the logic you used, although the implementation could be simpler.
But it all comes down to personal opinion. I believe that the importance of a player's placement in a tournament should be high; otherwise, the influence of the map becomes too strong. We don't need to look far for an example; consider the 6th stage of the World Cup. Differentiating participants only by the day they played was definitely foolish because the map was very simple and fast. As a result, we got very close results, and this was not due to the high level of the participants (half of them had played only 1-2 times in their lives), but rather to the conditions on the map. And Topor suggests ignoring placement altogether.
Therefore