Auto-translated
I think you've read the previous discussions, so you know that I support the idea of rewarding first-place finishes. I understand the logic you used, although the implementation could be simpler.
But it all comes down to personal opinion. I believe that the importance of a player's placement in a tournament should be high; otherwise, the influence of the map becomes too strong. We don't need to look far for an example; consider the 6th stage of the World Cup. Differentiating participants only by the day they played was definitely foolish because the map was very simple and fast. As a result, we got very close results, and this was not due to the high level of the participants (half of them had played only 1-2 times in their lives), but rather to the conditions on the map. And Topor suggests ignoring placement altogether.
Therefore