What should the judge's logic be in this situation, according to me? If one of the players takes the initiative to play, and the other hesitates, then an Overtime Decision (ODD) should be assigned. If both hesitate, then the tournament is closed without a final.
Kostya chose the second option. But here
/topic/at/1039683/
I quoted Vanya, and from his words it followed that he wasn't hesitant.
And right there, I ASK KOSTYA (that is, DirtyPlayer) – why didn’t he assign an ODD? And why didn’t he disqualify Dark if he continued to hesitate?
Apparently, Vanya (FTS), against the background of his current emotional state, took my words personally and thought that my words contained some kind of claims directed at him, although I never said anything like that anywhere (and even more importantly, I didn't mean it at all). :)
At least now, rereading what he wrote, based on this premise, his words make sense.
Hence - IT STARTED. In every post, Vanya proves that his ego is bigger than mine, and I didn't even notice it, and I continue to discuss the essence of the matter; besides it, as a rule, nothing else interests me. Well, I definitely don't plan to be responsible for the fact that Vanya decided to discuss with me something that I didn't say to him, and also misunderstood me.
As for this final, ideally, I think an ODD should have been assigned here (unless Vanya was having similar issues in a private message with Kostya). Note: it's the final match featuring Dark. That is, the option where players agree and play normally cannot be taken seriously. If this happens, it’s not a viable scenario; it’s a miracle. Let's continue.
The result of this ODD should have been a normal final or a predictable technical victory for Dark.
In case of a technical victory, we need to consider the option of a second normal final with Grizzwald, with a debuff applied to Grizzwald, or even a preliminary match between Grizzwald and Antiplayer, and then a match with the winner, again with a debuff.
That's approximately what I meant.