Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
If a significant number of new votes don't appear, it's clear that the option for 8 will win. Although it's technically a minority (3 against 4 and 5), this option appeals to a much larger number of players than the extreme options (6 or 10). In other words, those who support 8 will likely also support 6, and those who support 6 will likely also support 8, but those who support 10 are unlikely to support 6, and vice versa.
For these reasons, voting in elections is conducted in two stages to ensure that the candidate is truly supported by the majority (relative to the other candidate). That is, to ensure that the maximum number of people will be generally satisfied with the results, even if not 100%.
However, how to interpret the voting results is not for me to decide. I'm just offering advice.
By the way, the answer options are not entirely accurate – the original value, 3 shots, is missing. Yes, it's likely that few people will support it, or even the author may not agree with it, but that's no reason to ignore all the people who, for whatever reason, believe that the tent shouldn't be changed. It's no longer worth holding a revote because of this, but it would be good to take this into account in future polls.
Разработчик Heroes 5.5 WarGame Edition. Сайт проекта - пока неактивен Автор Асимметричных шахмат