Posts from Обсуждение: Kamikaze's Raiting

I looked at the ranking for the third game – it's quite interesting, but I have one question: why does no one have 100 points in the fourth column (if I understand correctly, this is the blitz tournament)? It seems like I took first place, but I was given 96 points and some change...:confused:

Kamikaze, in your table "rating for Heroes 3," I noticed some inconsistencies: specifically, with the participant numbers - for example, after 15 comes No. 19, then 16, then 18, then 17, and only then 20...
Maybe you made a mistake? If everything is correct, then please explain...

The thing is, Kamikaze used some system (including a list of participants) as a basis for calculating his rating...
and here are two possible scenarios:
1) He deliberately kept the participant numbers the same to clearly show the changes in the ranking of participants...
2) He simply moved people "down" or "up" (as the rating changed) without updating the numbering!

Alexander, even if we consider one of these options (although their principle is very similar, i.e., almost the same), then the question arises: why show the changes in the participants' ranking? What is the point of this? To show who has been on the forum longer? If that's the case, there are still questions... I'd like to hear what Kamikaze has to say about this...