Posts from Secret mission.

It would be more logical to name it "Restored from Oblivion"!

This is probably some kind of reference that, unfortunately, I don't know.

This seems to be some kind of reference that, unfortunately, I don't know.

So, "Secret Mission" was the title originally conceived by Arseny Adamov?!

No. I couldn't come up with any typical, grandiose names. "Secret Mission" is clickbait and understandable.

No one owes anyone anything. Streamers shouldn't be obligated to offer free content, just as you shouldn't be obligated (or forced) to watch content you don't like. Therefore, it follows that you want to watch content on a channel; otherwise, why would you try to change anything about it?
Besides, listening to you, it seems like any purchase is extortion! "Give me money, or I won't give you the coffee maker!!"

Or imagine that an old woman at the Gorkovskaya metro station was giving away pies for free (or very cheaply). They were delicious. Everyone liked them, and everyone took them. They praised the old woman, saying how great she was! But then, the old woman suddenly started asking 100 rubles per pie. Well, her financial situation had deteriorated significantly. Do you think it would be appropriate to approach the old woman and shout, "Ugh, you extortionist, demanding money for pies! You should just put up a sign that says 'PLEASE HELP'." It's just unpleasant.

You are acting in exactly the same way regarding the Remix (I hope I haven't offended anyone with this analogy). It's a shame, comrade, a shame.

I just saw your message. Actually, the analogy with the old woman is inappropriate. She could have started by giving them away and then decided to sell them (but not giving an empty pie/dough, and when asked what it is, saying that you have to pay for the filling). This means that the old woman made fun of you, rather than simply deciding to charge for it. And I came to a free cinema, which is what YouTube and its channel are (where 99% of the videos are free) or voluntarily. So, if the poster had said "tickets are 100 rubles," there would have been no questions. But instead, we came in, sat down, and watched halfway through the movie, and then the director comes out and says, "Pay up, or you won't see the end!" And if you don't have money, get out! That's what I'm talking about. Remix essentially changed the terms of the agreement unilaterally! This is even prohibited for banks. I wasn't insulting him; I just left his "cinema" = unsubscribed. That's all... I have nothing to be ashamed of. He started as a free streamer with VOLUNTARY donations, and then, in essence, started demanding money to continue the stream, and that's how I see it! As extortion, not a voluntary donation, which is what he "agreed" with me on for my subscription! My subscription, by the way, is expressed in monetary terms for him. Because the channel's monetization depends on a certain number of subscribers and hours of viewing! So, he still owes me for the subscription and hours of viewing, and I, in turn, terminated the agreement. So, I know the details and I know where I'm right and where I'm wrong. It's just petty and pathetic to engage in such manipulation of your audience! And I don't think you would like it yourself.

P.S. and also... it's not the streamer who makes the viewer/subscriber; it's the subscribers who make the streamer. Without us, he's nothing; we can do without him, but he would have to go work in a factory, like all normal people. And we would pay money and just go watch a movie.

P.P.S. screenshot! :) He could even delete all his videos and be within his rights, but I was talking about his attitude towards his "electorate," and I'm not wrong in saying that the author came out in the middle of the movie and started setting conditions and demanding money under duress, right??