Skip to content

Posts from Wonderful New World

5.0 (1 rating)
User Avatar
9 years ago
Auto-translated
elizbar1967, what exactly don't you like about the map, besides the fact that it's old? What specifically bothers you about it?
In reply to elizbar1967
User Avatar
9 years ago
Auto-translated
elizbar1967
...the map is just terrible.
Well, that's just your IMHO.
elizbar1967
Play maps created, for example, by markkurom, and you'll feel the difference.
Please provide a link to his map(s).
User Avatar
9 years ago
Auto-translated
Interesting, I see that there are new maps. I need to play them.
In reply to atlant108
User Avatar
9 years ago
Auto-translated
It’s certainly interesting, but that doesn’t mean the map this topic is about is bad – some people will like it, others won’t.
9 years ago
Auto-translated
There are no bad maps. Every author put in effort and spent time, which is already a good thing in itself. Some maps are interesting to play, while others are not. Since I mostly play against the computer in recent years, this map is boring to me. It's boring because, due to the lack of gates with strong garrisons or simply strong monsters at the junction points, it's impossible to develop properly; the opponents just jump around like jerks, and the game turns into a chase and kill. Personally, the last time I played it, I limited the number of heroes to two per faction. Otherwise, you don't get any enjoyment. That's how it is.
In reply to elizbar1967
User Avatar
9 years ago
Auto-translated
elizbar1967
There are no bad maps. Every author puts in effort and spends time, which is already a good thing. Some maps are interesting to play, while others are boring. Since I mostly play against the computer these days, this map is boring to me. It's boring because, due to the lack of strong garrisoned gates or simply strong monsters at the junctions, it's impossible to develop properly. The opponents just run around like crazy, and the game turns into a chase-and-kill scenario. Personally, the last time I played it, I limited the number of heroes to two per faction. Otherwise, it's not enjoyable. That's how it is.
Try playing the "Citadels" map. I'll tell you right away that it's my map. I don't want to brag, but judging by the description of what you don't like, my map doesn't have any of that. It has strong garrisons and so on.
I recommend playing as the blue or green player, or even the yellow player. I wouldn't recommend playing as the red player because, in terms of design, its territory isn't very appealing.
In reply to elizbar1967
User Avatar
9 years ago
Auto-translated
elizbar1967
There are no bad maps. Every author puts in effort and spends time, which is already a good thing in itself. Some maps are interesting to play, while others are boring. Since I mostly play against the computer in recent years, this map is boring to me. It's boring because, due to the lack of gates with strong garrisons or simply strong monsters at the connection points, it's impossible to develop properly; the opponents jump around like crazy, and the game turns into a chase and kill. Personally, the last time I played it, I limited the number of heroes to two per faction. Otherwise, you don't get any enjoyment. That's how it is.
In general, a dynamic game with interaction between players from the second week, in my opinion, is more interesting than spending a month or two building up and then using the "total clearing" method to crush everyone. But again, it's a matter of taste...
In reply to Rasvetribka
9 years ago
Auto-translated
Rasvetribka
Play the "Stronghold" map. I'll say right away that this is my map. I don't want to brag, but judging by the description of what you don't like, all of this is absent on my map. It has strong garrisons and so on.
I recommend playing as the blue or green player, or maybe the yellow one. I don't recommend playing as the red one because, in terms of design, its territory isn't very beautiful.
I've played Stronghold about ten times, maybe more))

Added 1 minute ago
SRD
In general, a dynamic game with player interaction is more interesting, in my opinion, than spending a month or two building up, and then using the "total clearing" method to crush everyone. But again, it's "a matter of taste..."

The way I play... I take three or four bottles of Spaten, sit down, and get twice the enjoyment. So, wild dynamics and a hurricane aren't my thing. But again, I agree – it's a matter of taste.
11 months ago
Auto-translated

I wonder, is there a mod available somewhere that adds a dwelling for phoenixes?

Because that square in the editor with the inscription "fire lake" is quite depressing...

In reply to padonkoff
User Avatar
11 months ago
Auto-translated
padonkoff

I wonder, is there a way to access this mod for the phoenix dwelling?

Because that square in the editor with the inscription "fire lake" is quite depressing...

Try contacting the developers of the EWA mod; I think they know what this mod is.

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: recijeb