Posts from Has anyone played it?

If we gather a good group of players, we can organize a tournament.

Are you talking about me? :smile26: :smile26: :smile26: I'm always ready to participate! :smile33:

I started playing with the second installment of Heroes. And it became my favorite game. Everything was, of course, in English, which I wasn't very good at... :) but I really wanted to know what was going on. :) Despite this, the game really got to me... The release of the third game was a shock! I bought all possible versions, I just became a huge fan, and I was disappointed with the fourth... with the fifth, I was blown away again. :) But, I digress... I only got to know the first Heroes after the fifth, I bought a disc that contained all the parts. It also had the second one, but it was already translated, which I was very happy about. :)

1. Heroes of Might and Magic is 100 times better than the 4th installment (:smile18: :smile18: :smile18:). I played it 10 years ago, but even now it's a benchmark for turn-based strategy for me:smile41:

I started with the third game, then played the fourth, then the fifth, and after that, I played the first one. The voice acting and graphics, in my opinion, are amazing. It's simply fantastic. There weren't the excessive elements of a great game that started, in part, with the third installment.

Here, in the sixth stage, Kanigem discovered the first part of Heroes. For the first couple of days, he just lazed around, almost bursting his gut with laughter. By the end of the week, he started to understand the principles of this "great" game. And now he can play it properly. In short, it's a great thing!!!

During the sixth stage of Kanigem, I discovered the first part of Heroes. For the first two days, I just lay around, almost burst my stomach from laughing. By the end of the week, I started to understand the principles of this "great" game. And now I can play it normally. In short, it's a great thing!!!

And I still couldn't understand what was so special about the first Heroes game. No, it's not for me...

I started playing them (like many others) when the platinum edition of Heroes was released. I enjoyed the game, and it was interesting to see where the series began.

I also started back in the day with Heroes II; I remember stubbornly playing Roland's campaign then, but I never managed to complete it, getting stuck on the final mission. And not so long ago, I bought the Platinum Edition and only recently got around to trying it out; I completed the campaign for Ironfist in same first Heroes (which I had never seen before) and several separate scenarios (thanks to having an old computer, a Pentium 200). What can I say—the first Heroes turned out not to be as daunting as I expected, and sometimes even quite interesting; the castle system is very balanced with no obvious bias, and the graphics are own decent too. However, they didn't really capture my heart, as I get the impression that the authors simply ignored the plot or there isn't one here in principle. It was specifically the plot—or rather, its absence—that left an unpleasant impression, but in terms of gameplay, it is playable and sometimes even interesting.

YES! ... the plot is certainly lacking, but you can attribute this to the age of the game and its size.... I still remember how my friends and I copied it onto floppy disks, bringing 10 disks each to transfer the files.... but it doesn't diminish its appeal; for me, the main thing is to have a good time battling, and in the first Heroes game, the computer is probably the most aggressive opponent!!!
The campaigns are somewhat weak, but some scenarios, with the most difficult settings, are almost impossible to beat!!!

I don't think the lack of a plot can be attributed to the game's age; they simply didn't put in the effort, as there were many games at the time with excellent storylines.

I first played parts 1 and 2 on the Platinum edition. It was a lot of fun!

I played all the games.
In the first and second parts, I played on the platinum difficulty.

I don't think I wrote about the first one... I liked it the least. The second one is similar, but the battles are very different. The second one is better.

I've played them all.
Each game is better than the last.

started with the first game in 1998 on my first computer... played as Ironfist.

then, half a year later, I played the second game, but it was all in English, so I didn't really finish it.

and then, half a year ago, I bought the Platinum Edition and played through both the first and second games (now I'm slowly playing through The Price of Loyalty).

I just couldn't understand what was so special about the first Heroes game. It's just not my thing...

The first Heroes game had an unparalleled romantic atmosphere! The second one is, of course, better, but the first part is the beginning of everything :p