Auto-translated
What do you think about the ranger abilities of the Sylvan heroes? :confused:
Personally, I didn't like them very much.
Personally, I didn't like them very much.
UTER
Posts from Heroes in Heroes of Might and Magic V: graphics, biographies, skills...
Uke-by_HoMM![Zавулон]
Auto-translated
I don't remember his name, but I always choose him when playing as the Ranger. He specializes in hunters and luck.
Vlad
Auto-translated
I don't remember his name, but I always choose him for the Rangers. He specializes in hunters and luck.
ZeroSpeed
Auto-translated
Guys, you're impressive; maybe you could draw it yourselves... But would professional designers criticize you? It would be interesting... I'm personally proud that Russians were entrusted with creating a game of this kind, and they did a pretty good job. I personally expected much less. Well done. I don't know about you, but I used to think that the graphics in Heroes 3 looked very bland and unattractive, but then I got used to it. Heroes 5 has its own kind of beauty. Let's try to find some positive aspects.
Auto-translated
I am personally proud that Russians were entrusted with creating a game of this kind, and they did a good job.
I don't know about you, but I used to think that the graphics in Heroes 3 looked very bland and unattractive, but then I got used to it. Heroes 5 is beautiful in its own way. Let's try to find some positive aspects.
Regarding the topic: the heroes are drawn quite well, but why doesn't the male hero differ from the female hero? You choose a stunning sorceress, but on the battlefield, instead of her, there is... a skeleton! Is that really acceptable? Well, never mind, a necromancer is a necromancer. But why doesn't an elf differ from an elf maiden?! Couldn't the developers have drawn 6 more hero models (or rather, heroines)?
KAHT
Auto-translated
Regarding the topic: the heroes are drawn quite well, but why doesn't the male hero differ from the female hero? You choose a stunning necromancer, and on the battlefield, instead of her, there's... a skeleton! Is that really acceptable? Well, never mind, a necromancer is a necromancer. But why shouldn't an elf differ from an elf? Was it really so difficult for the developers to draw six more hero models (or rather, heroines)?
In principle, the heroines and heroes don't differ, as you say, but if you think about it, have you ever seen a difference between a man's and a woman's armor (except, of course, for the curves on the chest)?
***JOKER***
Auto-translated
Well, actually, Drizzt, only Necromancers can be confused like that. All other heroes are clearly and distinctly divided into women and men!
Auto-translated
In principle, male and female heroes don't differ, or at least, if you think about it, have you ever seen a difference between a man's and a woman's armor (except, of course, for the curves on the chest)?
Besides the "curves," men and women differ in their faces, musculature, and overall physique. The heroes' faces are also well-drawn, and it's clear that they are male. Of course, there are some women who could be mistaken for men:D, but there don't seem to be any such portraits.
Vlad
Auto-translated
I've almost finished the entire campaign... and I also liked the heroes... the faces are beautifully drawn... it's a pity that their lips don't move... but it doesn't matter.... And overall, everything is great.
***JOKER***
Auto-translated
And wizards don’t even open their mouths when talking, they just smoke! A hookah is a great thing!
<garkin>
Auto-translated
I've almost finished the entire campaign... and I also liked the heroes... the faces are beautifully drawn... it's a pity that their lips don't move... but it doesn't matter... And everything else is great.
Vlad
Auto-translated
It's a pity that the heroes don't differ in appearance based on their gender... I really liked how they designed the Sylvan and Necropolis characters, though. :)
Proaxel
Auto-translated
I checked the forum, and there's nothing interesting there. It feels like a gathering of cartoon enthusiasts rather than fans of the greatest strategy game of all time.
Vlad
Auto-translated
I checked the forum, but there's nothing interesting. It feels like a bunch of cartoon fans gathered there, not fans of the greatest strategy game of all time...
Varg-Nar
Auto-translated
Message from Proaxel
I checked the forum, and there's nothing interesting. It feels like it's full of people who love cartoons rather than the greatest strategy game of all time...
Well, you might be right; the messages don't contain as much information as some would like. But it's still some kind of discussion. As for the strategists, what else can they do in their free time besides tournaments? Of course, they'll discuss what they're playing (even if not all of them are strategists, many have the basics). And everyone has a different view of the discussions. For example, I don't always understand why a particular post was written, but that's not my business. In the end, there are moderators who try to keep an eye on things. As for my "method" of playing the strategy, I don't really like to talk about it, only when it's necessary.
After playing the game for a few weeks, I can draw the following conclusions.
The graphics are wonderful; there's a lot of movement and liveliness in the interface. The maps are beautifully and interestingly designed. (It's interesting how much effort the developers put into these landscapes.)
Statistics
Welcome our newest member:
recijeb