Posts from Attitude towards complete anti-magic!

The Scroll of Exorcism is found quite often. And if you need magic, it's easier to level up another hero, specifically a mage. Otherwise, all the Barbarian's usefulness will slip through your fingers... if he's busy with something else instead of focusing on spellcasting.

We're talking about rare items... the kind you can find in the Wizard's Tower (if you defeat them). Sometimes you can find a whole bunch. And a teleport and a castle gate – if you're lucky!

Being a Barbarian means just attacking everyone, but the result isn't as impressive as using various 5th-level spells, right? You're all talking about the Barbarian, but what if there's a battle between two Wizards, and one has full anti-magic? What's the point of magic in that case???

Complete anti-magic on the opponent significantly reduces their interest in the battle. Especially when playing a two-player game with a Barbarian.

If it were a complete immunity, that would be one thing, but as far as I remember, you can cast positive spells on it... and that's already unfair...

Why is it not unfair?! If this wasn't the case, any hero could be defeated immediately on the first turn with magic, and the entire battle would almost be lost. So, 100% resistance is a very good thing; it doesn't worsen anything, but only makes things more challenging.

Well, that's if you cast the Anti-Magic spell on monsters. And ZYbr, as far as I understand, meant a hero with the Resistance skill...
ZYbr, correct me if I'm wrong.

Can anyone tell me... If a hero has the Resistance ability, can they cast a positive spell on themselves? Or is it the same as with the Anti-Magic spell?